Semeiotica Biofisica Quantistica. Il Nuovo Rinascimento della Medicina. www.sisbq.org

Articoli con tag ‘Chi ha paura?’

Chi ha paura dei Reali Rischi Congeniti della Semeiotica Biofisica Quantistica?   Cardiologica provocazione rivolta a Luminari e Autorità Sanitarie competenti.

“Nella sua grandezza il genio disdegna le strade battute da altri e cerca regioni ancora inesplorate”.
(Abraham Lincoln)

Nel mio blog si legge il seguente commento:

https://www.facebook.com/Semeiotica-Biofisica-Quantistica-219462041468111/

Semeiotica Biofisica Quantistica

Cardiologia Semeiotico-Biofisico-Quantistica. La vita grama di un illuminato nell’Era dei Lumi Spenti.
Pensi il Lettore alla mia sofferenza nel vedere il volto di Colleghi Cardiologi quando dico loro che la SBQ, arricchita dalla Diagnostica Psicocinetica, permette al Medico di diagnosticare le microcalcificazioni coronariche e valvolari, stenosi minime valvolari, lievi dilatazioni atrio e ventricolari, foro di Botallo pervio, iniziali compromissioni della dilatazione ventricola dx. e/o sn., primo segno di insufficienza cardiaca, lievi anomalie motorie del setto interventricolare, alterazioni della funzione di trasmissione dello stimolo nervoso nelle cellule di Purkinge, ed altro ancora.
1) Sergio Stagnaro (2012). Ecocardiogramma Semeiotico-Biofisico-Quantistico. Valutazione delle Funzioni Cardiache. Reale Rischio Congenito di Cad. www.sisbq.org, Libri e Articoli, http://www.sisbq.org/uploads/5/6/8/7/5687930/ecg_sbq.pdf
2) Sergio Stagnaro (2019). ATS Constitution-Dependent, Inherited Real Risk is the conditio sine qua non of coronary disorder, including AMI. European Society of Cardioloy, ESC, Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/…/41/3385/5521149
3) Sergio Stagnaro (2019). La sindrome di Sant’Orsola: Impending Cardiac Arrest.
http://www.sisbq.org/…/5/6/8/7/56879…/sindromesantorsola.pdf

Dal momento che nessuno finora ha potuto falsificare quanto io affermo nei miei articoli, allora mi domando perché Luminari della Medicina e Autorità Sanitarie competenti non introducono anche la Cardiologia Semeiotico-Biofisico-Quantistica nell’insegnamento Universitario?

L’infarto Miocardico causa una Strage di Innocenti, che non risparmia Medici, Politici e Informatori dei progressi della Medicina. Da circa cinquant’anni i Cardiologi di tutto il mondo cercano invano uno strumento per riconoscere chi è predisposto a questa grave cardiopatia.

Cosa spiega dunque il comportamento suicida-omicida, cioè il silenzio, di tanti probiviri sul Reale Rischio Congenito di CAD?

Invito chi, ignorante in SBQ, ha definito i miei scritti pseudoscienza e coloro che gli hanno prestato ascolto a leggere il seguente commento accettato e pubblicato dopo circa un mese di onesta valutazione:

https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/40/41/3385/5521149#usercomments

Comment to European Heart Journal

ATS Constitution-Dependent, Inherited Real Risk is the conditio sine qua non of coronary disorder, including AMI

10 November 2019

Sergio Stagnaro

Quantum Biophysical Semeiotic Research Laboratory

Overlooking ATS Constitution-Dependent, Inherited Real Risk of CAD, conditio sine qua non of the heart coronary disorder, accounts for the reason CAD is today’s growing epidemics and yhe most cause of death round the world.   CAD environmental risk factors (about 300!) can facilitate and worsen CAD onset, but exclusively in individuals involved by CAD Inherited Real Risk (1-5).

Unfortunately, almost all physicians and cardiologists ignore (better spoken, overlook!) quantum-biophysical-semeiotic constitutions and related inherited real risks, that accounts for the reason of today’s CAD, type 2 Diabetes Melllitus, and Cancer growing epidemics (www.semeioticabiofisica.it, http://www.sisbq.org).

In spite of an awful number of papers, aiming to spread such as knowledge , unavoidable in CAD growing epidemics Primary Prevention, there is a terrible lacking of information among physicians. As far as CAD is concerned, notoriously coronary inherited real risk, as well as sub-clinical, and consequently very dangerous, coronary heart disease is very prevalent, independently associated with actually known risk of CAD, and substantially increases the risk (presence of newborn- pathological, type I, subtype b) aspecific, Endoarterial Blocking Devices in coronary small arteries, according to Hammersen), among patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus. In following, I suggest – once again – an useful, reliable and easy clinical manoeuvre, that allows doctor to recognize both CAD Inherited Real Risk and silent CAD (2-4).   This manoeuvre proved to be really useful in my 64-year-long clinical experience, also in order to the bed-side recognizing heart ischaemic disease decades before cardiac pathology occurs. Moreover, it is well known that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) may have no symptoms at all for many years or decades and that the electrocardiographic features of ischaemia may be induced by exercise without accompaning angina (3). In other words, we need a clinical tool reliable in rapid detecting CAD, even clinically silent, initiating from CAD Inheriterd Real Risk, i.e., from birth, doctor can now utilize in day-to-day practice (2).

Myocardial Ischaemic Quantum-Biophysical-Semeiotic Preconditioning, described elsewhere (1), proved to be really useful and easy to be applied. From the technical viewpoint, doctor has to know, at least, the auscultatory percussion of the stomach, described even in old academic books of two last centuries (e.g., Rasario IX edition).

In health, digital pressure of mean intensity (700 dyne/cm.2), applied upon heart cutaneous projection area, brings about the so-called gastric aspecific reflex (= in the stomach, fundus and body are dilated; on the contrary, antral-pyloric region contracts) after an age-dependent latency time of 8 sec., that lasts less than 4 sec. (= parameter value of paramount significance since it parallels the efficacy of coronary microvessel Microcirculatory Funcional Reserve).   A second, successive evaluation after an interval of 5 sec. exactly, provokes the identical reflex, but after lt. of 16 sec. , namely doublede: physiological myocardial preconditioning, type I.

On the contrary, in patients involved by CAD, even silent, i.e. subclinical, latency time persists identical in both evaluations, or results clearly lower in the second one, in relation with disease seriousness: type II and respectively type III preconditioning.

Of course, quantum biophysical semeiotic preconditioning evaluation, really more complex than it appears in the above brief description, can be applied to all others biological systems, with favourable influences on primary prevention and diagnosis (1).

Interestingly, Quantum Biophysical Semeiotics, based on non local Realm in biological systems, I demonstrated for the first time, beside the local realm, in only one second physicians can recognize clinically healthy heart, excluding CAD Congenital Real Risk, even in individuals kilometres away : Caotino’s Sign (2-5).

Finally, CAD Inherited Real Risk can be removed completely, id.e., healed under Reconstructing Mitochondrial Quantum Therapy, i.e., with Modified Mediterranean diet, etimologically speaking, personalized application of LLLT, including NIR- LED, and Ak-Tom, acting also stimulating hearth stem cells, among others well-known action mechanisms (16).Very recently I have demonstrated the intense efficiency and action mechansms of thermal sulfidrilic water (e.g., Porretta Terme, Bologna, Italy).

References

1) Stagnaro Sergio.   CAD Inherited Real Risk, Based on Newborn-Pathological, Type I, Subtype B, Aspecific, Coronary Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices. Diagnostic Role of Myocardial Oxygenation and Biophysical-Semeiotic Preconditioning. International Atherosclerosis Society. http://www.athero.org, 29 April, 2009, http://www.athero.org/commentaries/comm907.asp ora in rete http://www.sisbq.org/uploads/5/6/8/7/5687930/iasatherocommentarycadrr907.pdf

2) Stagnaro Sergio. Role of Coronary Endoarterial Blocking Devices in Myocardial Preconditioning – c007i. Lecture, V Virtual International Congress of Cardiology, 2007. http://www.fac.org.ar/qcvc/llave/c007i/stagnaros.php

3) Stagnaro Sergio.   Bedside Evaluation of CAD biophysical-semeiotic inherited real risk under NIR-LED treatment. EMLA Congress, Laser Helsinki August 23-24, 2008. “Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy”, Elsevier, Vol. 5 suppl 1 august 2008 issn 1572-1000.

4) Sergio Stagnaro (2012). I Segni di Caotino* e di Gentile** nella Diagnosi di Reale Rischio Congenito di CAD e di Infarto Miocardico, ancorché iniziale o silente. Fisiopatologia e Terapia. Lectio Magistralis. III Convegno della SISBQ, 9-10 Giugno 2012, Porretta Terme (Bologna). http://www.sisbq.org. http://www.sisbq.org/uploads/5/6/8/7/5687930/presentazione_stagnaro_it.pdf ; English version: http://www.sisbq.org/uploads/5/6/8/7/5687930/presentazione_stagnaro_eng.pdf

5) Sergio Stagnaro and Simone Caramel. The Inherited Real Risk of Coronary Artery Disease, Nature PG., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 67, page 683 (2013), http://www.nature.com/ejcn/journal/v67/n6/full/ejcn201337a.html [MEDLINE].

 

Concludo con una domanda: Chi ha paura dei Reali Rischi Congeniti, dipendenti dalle relative Costituzioni Semeiotico-Biofisico-Quantistiche?

Cloud dei tag