Semeiotica Biofisica Quantistica. Il Nuovo Rinascimento della Medicina. www.sisbq.org

Ecco, dopo quella “automatica”, la prima risposta al mio commento critico, che ho appena ricevuto dalla CDC:

—- Original Message —–

From: “CDC-INFO” <CDCINFO@cdc.gov>

To: <dottsergio@semeioticabiofisica.it>

Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:03 PM

Subject: RE: Statines against Cancer overlooking Oncological Terrai? Occasum.

Thank you for your submission to CDC-INFO about the article, Continuation With Statin Therapy and the Risk of Primary Cancer: A Population-Based Study, that you observed on the CDC website.

Your comments have been forwarded to the CDC National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion for their information. They will contact you directly if they have questions.

If you have additional questions, please call 1-800-CDC-INFO, email cdcinfo@cdc.gov, or visit www.cdc.gov.
Di seguito, dopo la rapida risposta “automatica” di ricevimento del mio commento critico, la statunitense CDC mi manda oggi, Ferragosto,

CDC-INFO is a service of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) through a contract with Vangent, Inc.

KN
[THREAD ID:2-DMCXD] [SR: 2-22878110]

—–Original Message—–

From:  dottsergio@semeioticabiofisica.it
Sent:  8/12/2012 12:18:49 AM
To:  dottsergio@semeioticabiofisica.it
Cc:  Scienza&Conoscenza <redazione@scienzaeconoscenza.it>; Volpe Roberto Prof CNR <r.volpe@spp.cnr.it>; New Engl J Med <editorial@nejm.org>; Istituto Europ Oncol Sideri Mario <mario.sideri@ieo.it>; Simone Mailing Group<sisbq_medicaldoctors@yahoogroups.com>; Giuseppe Mancia<giuseppe.mancia@unimib.it>; Mondini Alberto Libertà Cura<albertomondini@aerrepici.org>; JAMA <ama-subs@ama-assn.org>; “Di Bella Prof. Giuseppe” <posta@giuseppedibella.it>; Federaz Argent Cardiol<info-pcvc@fac.org.ar>; Diabetologia Editors <diabetologia-j@bristol.ac.uk>; Lancet Editors <Editorial@lancet.com>; Marianna De Palma<mari_madeche@hotmail.com>; BMC Editors <editorial@biomedcentral.com>; Medico d’Italia Bernardini <numedi@tiscalinet.it>; “ATHERO .org” <info@athero.org>; De Magistris Prof Roberto a <RDEMA@UNINA2.IT>; Altro Giornale<pasgal@gmail.com>; Ann Int Med Editors <annp@mail.acponline.org>; <redazione@ilsecoloXIX.it>; <info.roma@fondazioneveronesi.it>; <umbert.veronesi@ieo.it>; <silvio.garattini@marionegri.it>; <mnegri@marionegri.it>; <asco@asco.org>; <jcoservice@asco.org>; <jopcontact@asco.org>; <contactus@cancer.net>
Subject:  Statines against Cancer overlooking Oncological Terrai? Occasum.
To Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and to ALL, especially to Elyse Blye, ASCO Senior Editorial Assistant,
the article published on Journal current issue, “Continuation With Statin Therapy and the Risk of Primary Cancer: A Population-Based Study,  “Miriam Lutski, et al., Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:120005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.120005, though considered worthy of Medscape CME…, is fundamentally based since it is no up-dated.

In fact, neither Authors, nor CDC Editors, and Reviewers – not to speak of Medscape friends, of course  –  seemingly ignore, perhaps overlook,  Oncological Terrain-Dependent, Inherited Real Risk, beside recognised, i.e., with a simple stethoscope, and healed with BLUE THERAPY www.sisbq.org  and  www.semeioticabiofisica.it.

Really, based on a long-well-established experience, you may read in above websites Bibliography, individuals not involved by such a predisposition to cancer, characterised by microcirculatory remodelling, showing typical newborn-pathological, type I, subtype a) ONCOLOGICAL, Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices in arterioles and small artery, accordinf to Hammersen, due to the lowering of fractal dimension of both mit-DNA and n-DNA in parenchimal cells, according to my  Angiobiopathy Theory,  where the cancer can occur, will never suffer fron MALIGNCY, independently of using or not STATINE and  smoking tobacco!

At this point, I emphasise the severe, dangerous  muscle disorder – deadly rabdomyolysis – brought about by statine assumption by individual suffering from NO-Recognised  Co Q 10 Deficiency Syndrome (Stagnaro-Neri M., Stagnaro S., Sindrome clinica percusso-ascoltatoria da carenza di Co Q10. Medic. Geriatr. XXIV, 239, 1993), I have denounced 12 years before CERIVASTATINE bad story:
Stagnaro-Neri M., Stagnaro S., Carenza di Co Q10 secondaria a terapia ipolipidemizante diagnosticata con la Percussione Ascoltata. Settimana Italiana di Dietologia, 9-13 Aprile 1991, Merano. Atti, pg. 65. Epat. 37, 17, 1990.

Finally, I think that  the time has come to re-evaluate the greatest “economic” enterprise, i.e., FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY, at the light of Quantum Biophysical Semeiotics results:

Sergio Stagnaro. Without CAD Inherited Real Risk, All Environmental Risk Factors of CAD are innocent Bystanders. Canadian Medical Association Journal. CMAJ, 14 Dec 2009,  http://www.cmaj.ca/content/181/12/E267/reply

Stagnaro Sergio.    CAD Inherited Real Risk, Based on Newborn-Pathological, Type I, Subtype B, Aspecific, Coronary Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices. Diagnostic Role of Myocardial Oxygenation and Biophysical-Semeiotic Preconditioning.International Atherosclerosis Society. www.athero.org, 29 April, 2009  http://www.athero.org/commentaries/comm907.asp

Stagnaro Sergio. Role of Coronary Endoarterial Blocking Devices in Myocardial Preconditioning – c007i. Lecture, V Virtual International Congress of Cardiology, 2007. http://www.fac.org.ar/qcvc/llave/c007i/stagnaros.php

Do you agree with me, don’t you?

I appreciate your critical answer.

Regards,

Sergio Stagnaro MD
Via Erasmo Piaggio 23/8,
16039 Riva Trigoso (Genoa) Italy
Ph 0039-0185-42315
Cell. 3338631439
www.semeioticabiofisica.it
www.sisbq.org
dottsergio@semeioticabiofisica.it

In attesa di seguire gli eventi, con piacere noto che gli statunitensi non sono intollerant alle critiche come i “Professori” italiani, che non rispondono oppure respingono le mie mail, come fossero spam!

Conservo alcune mail di “Professori”, tra loro anche sedicenti “CATTOLICI”, che mi invitano, assai infastiditi, a non scrivere più mail indirizzate a loro.

Nel commento, ancora una volta,  trovate il mio J’accuse:  “I think that  the time has come to re-evaluate the greatest “economic” enterprise, i.e., FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY, at the light of Quantum Biophysical Semeiotics results”.

To be continued!

Lascia un commento

Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:

Logo WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Google+ photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google+. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Connessione a %s...

Tag Cloud

%d blogger cliccano Mi Piace per questo: